<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does More Cores Mean Less Nodes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clusterconnection.com/2009/10/does-more-cores-mean-less-nodes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clusterconnection.com/2009/10/does-more-cores-mean-less-nodes/</link>
	<description>Simplify HPC. Share the knowledge.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 11:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeraa2t</title>
		<link>http://www.clusterconnection.com/2009/10/does-more-cores-mean-less-nodes/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>jeraa2t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clusterconnection.com/?p=1479#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I wonder if system memory bandwidth will be able to keep up with this many cores per node with some of the multithreaded apps out there today. Also, one node goes down, loosing 32 or 64 cores at a time is not acceptable in some cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if system memory bandwidth will be able to keep up with this many cores per node with some of the multithreaded apps out there today. Also, one node goes down, loosing 32 or 64 cores at a time is not acceptable in some cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

